http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/2008/02/02/data-wants-to-be-free/ on flying small planes. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:57:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/2008/02/02/data-wants-to-be-free/#comment-20297 david Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:31:20 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/2008/02/02/data-wants-to-be-free/#comment-20297 sidx: Originally, I used a variety of inputs to set a score automatically, including number and length of runways, published instrument approaches, possession of ICAO and IATA codes (IATA is worth more because it's rarer), presence in the top 100 airports list, and one or two other things. I then set cutoffs for the three sizes. Since then, however, I've been editing some of them by hand, and I hope to open that up before too long. I think that they're right most of the time, but some are obviously off by a category. sidx: Originally, I used a variety of inputs to set a score automatically, including number and length of runways, published instrument approaches, possession of ICAO and IATA codes (IATA is worth more because it’s rarer), presence in the top 100 airports list, and one or two other things. I then set cutoffs for the three sizes. Since then, however, I’ve been editing some of them by hand, and I hope to open that up before too long. I think that they’re right most of the time, but some are obviously off by a category.

]]> http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/2008/02/02/data-wants-to-be-free/#comment-20296 sidx Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:06:34 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/2008/02/02/data-wants-to-be-free/#comment-20296 When you're classifying the airports as Small/Medium/Large, what criterion are you using? The reason I ask is that it doesn't seem to hold based on the length of the longest runway or the MTOW of the heaviest aircraft that can land there (for a few airports I know). Is it categorized according to traffic? When you’re classifying the airports as Small/Medium/Large, what criterion are you using? The reason I ask is that it doesn’t seem to hold based on the length of the longest runway or the MTOW of the heaviest aircraft that can land there (for a few airports I know). Is it categorized according to traffic?

]]> http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/2008/02/02/data-wants-to-be-free/#comment-20277 david Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:56:57 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/2008/02/02/data-wants-to-be-free/#comment-20277 Paul: Thanks right, it's ISO 3166-1 alpha 2. That does have its issues (including slower ammendments when countries change), but it's well-known internationally, while FIPS 10-4 is used mainly in the U.S. ISO 3166 is also well-known from domain names (modulo the UK/GB difference). Paul: Thanks right, it’s ISO 3166-1 alpha 2. That does have its issues (including slower ammendments when countries change), but it’s well-known internationally, while FIPS 10-4 is used mainly in the U.S. ISO 3166 is also well-known from domain names (modulo the UK/GB difference).

]]> http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/2008/02/02/data-wants-to-be-free/#comment-20276 Paul Tomblin Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:54:07 +0000 http://www.megginson.com/blogs/lahso/2008/02/02/data-wants-to-be-free/#comment-20276 What country code is that you're using? I'm guessing it's ISO 3166-1 Alpha-2. Navaid.com uses FIPS 10-4. What country code is that you’re using? I’m guessing it’s ISO 3166-1 Alpha-2. Navaid.com uses FIPS 10-4.

]]>