<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s OK to wish me &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/</link>
	<description>what was</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digital Earth Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cultural Sensitivity</title>
		<link>http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19020</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Earth Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cultural Sensitivity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 01:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19020</guid>
		<description>[...] David Megginson says it&#8217;s OK to wish him Merry Christmas, and says he&#8217;s tired of people searching for culturally sensitive things to say. In the interest of culturally sensitivity I thought I&#8217;d pass on a message received from a friend, minus the culturally insensitive first paragraph.  Greetings to Everyone at this time of the generally accepted calendar. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Megginson says it&#8217;s OK to wish him Merry Christmas, and says he&#8217;s tired of people searching for culturally sensitive things to say. In the interest of culturally sensitivity I thought I&#8217;d pass on a message received from a friend, minus the culturally insensitive first paragraph.  Greetings to Everyone at this time of the generally accepted calendar. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19008</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 00:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19008</guid>
		<description>Fair enough; the debate's pretty strange to me too, here in the future Independent Republic.

&#60;span lang="yib"&#62;And why shouldn't she wish you a merry Christmas, anyhow?  Frankly, Daveedkeh, you look like a goy.&#60;/span&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough; the debate&#8217;s pretty strange to me too, here in the future Independent Republic.</p>
<p>&lt;span lang=&#8221;yib&#8221;&gt;And why shouldn&#8217;t she wish you a merry Christmas, anyhow?  Frankly, Daveedkeh, you look like a goy.&lt;/span&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19004</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 14:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19004</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, John.  It looks like that posting is more about a deliberately-misleading survey and a (to us in Canada) strange, foreign political/cultural debate than it is about the phrase itself.  My posting is actually about personal greetings &#8212; I can sympathize with a retail business choosing to use neutral language like "Happy Holidays" (though the woman behind the counter at our local kosher bagel shop just wished me "Merry Christmas" this morning) &#8212; but more generally, I wouldn't want someone like Bill O'Reilly to have &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; effect on what I say, positive or negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, John.  It looks like that posting is more about a deliberately-misleading survey and a (to us in Canada) strange, foreign political/cultural debate than it is about the phrase itself.  My posting is actually about personal greetings &#8212; I can sympathize with a retail business choosing to use neutral language like &#8220;Happy Holidays&#8221; (though the woman behind the counter at our local kosher bagel shop just wished me &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221; this morning) &#8212; but more generally, I wouldn&#8217;t want someone like Bill O&#8217;Reilly to have <em>any</em> effect on what I say, positive or negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19002</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 10:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19002</guid>
		<description>Geoff Nunberg's Language Log article at http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003954.html may provide some insight into what the actual issues are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff Nunberg&#8217;s Language Log article at <a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003954.html" rel="nofollow">http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003954.html</a> may provide some insight into what the actual issues are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godfrey Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19001</link>
		<dc:creator>Godfrey Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/22/its-ok-to-wish-me-merry-christmas/#comment-19001</guid>
		<description>Happy  Christmas, David and anybody else who'll be glad of the wish!
There's at least oddity, and perhaps hypocrisy or delusion, when one is frowned on for using words that for a long,long have been in general use and are not intrinsically insulting BUT indisputable evils - like thousands of children weekly dying from Malaria - aren't anything many of us seem to get upset over.   Arguably, that would be too distressing?
I am six feet four inches tall and so, having lived mostly in Britain or Eat Asia, have many memories of banging my head on beams or doorways built hving in mind people less tal than I am.  I could call myself 'vertically callenged' ~ I'd not dream of doing that although I once asked a shop assistant of about 4' 9" in height if he would agree the politically correct way of refering to his [hysical stature would also be apt for mine because of the 'blows of outrageous transoms' I suffer; he did agree.
Then there's 'fat'   If a human being weighs over 250 pounds &#38; is not over seven feet tall there's going to be enough of him or her that is fat to make that noun an apt adjective for describing one aspect of the weighty person.  
Similarly, on various days of the year a particular group of people will clebrate some anniversary they believe the day marks or the start of a New Year on one of the many calendars people have devised.   One of the few open aspects of Singapore was the acceptance that on, let's say, Deepavali if somebody smilingly said something to you that was completely incomprehensible the chances were you were being wished a happy new year as Hindus start one.
I stopped being a Christian long ago and I'll argue with anybody who want me to accept that the first chapter of Genesis is a convicing account of how there's anything.  Maybe they'll come to my point of view, maybe not, maybe I'll become a creationist, though I doubt it.  I don't need anybody to protect me from views that seem ill-founded by my lights.  Diversity is part of this world and to seek to constrain expression is the opposite of tolerance ~ even if attempted to prohibit offending those who hold other views than another - like mine or yours.
This is too long!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy  Christmas, David and anybody else who&#8217;ll be glad of the wish!<br />
There&#8217;s at least oddity, and perhaps hypocrisy or delusion, when one is frowned on for using words that for a long,long have been in general use and are not intrinsically insulting BUT indisputable evils - like thousands of children weekly dying from Malaria - aren&#8217;t anything many of us seem to get upset over.   Arguably, that would be too distressing?<br />
I am six feet four inches tall and so, having lived mostly in Britain or Eat Asia, have many memories of banging my head on beams or doorways built hving in mind people less tal than I am.  I could call myself &#8216;vertically callenged&#8217; ~ I&#8217;d not dream of doing that although I once asked a shop assistant of about 4&#8242; 9&#8243; in height if he would agree the politically correct way of refering to his [hysical stature would also be apt for mine because of the &#8216;blows of outrageous transoms&#8217; I suffer; he did agree.<br />
Then there&#8217;s &#8216;fat&#8217;   If a human being weighs over 250 pounds &amp; is not over seven feet tall there&#8217;s going to be enough of him or her that is fat to make that noun an apt adjective for describing one aspect of the weighty person.<br />
Similarly, on various days of the year a particular group of people will clebrate some anniversary they believe the day marks or the start of a New Year on one of the many calendars people have devised.   One of the few open aspects of Singapore was the acceptance that on, let&#8217;s say, Deepavali if somebody smilingly said something to you that was completely incomprehensible the chances were you were being wished a happy new year as Hindus start one.<br />
I stopped being a Christian long ago and I&#8217;ll argue with anybody who want me to accept that the first chapter of Genesis is a convicing account of how there&#8217;s anything.  Maybe they&#8217;ll come to my point of view, maybe not, maybe I&#8217;ll become a creationist, though I doubt it.  I don&#8217;t need anybody to protect me from views that seem ill-founded by my lights.  Diversity is part of this world and to seek to constrain expression is the opposite of tolerance ~ even if attempted to prohibit offending those who hold other views than another - like mine or yours.<br />
This is too long!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
